Posted on October 28, 2009 by clotworthy
National Academy Press
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12794
[Press release] A report just released by the National Academies of Science estimates the “hidden” costs of energy production and use. These costs, which include human health effects, physical damages to buildings and other structures, and reduction in grain crop harvests caused by air pollution are not reflected in market prices of coal, [...]
Filed under: Energy and Climate, Human Health | Tagged: Air Quality, Cost Benefit Analysis, Electricity | Leave a Comment »
Posted on August 27, 2009 by clotworthy
Copenhagen Concensus / by Carlo Carraro, Francesco Bosello and Enrica De Cian
http://tinyurl.com/mkx7ga
[From a Reuters article by Alister Doyle] Helping developing nations adapt to climate change will bring greater economic benefits than a focus on deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, according to a study commissioned by Bjorn Lomborg, the controversial Danish researcher.
Spending [...]
Filed under: Energy and Climate | Tagged: Climate Change, Adaptation, Development, Cost Benefit Analysis | Leave a Comment »
Posted on August 27, 2009 by clotworthy
Center for the Study of Energy Markets, University of California Energy Institute / by Christopher R. Knittel
http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/PDF/csemwp189.pdf
[Abstract] The Cash for Clunker program aims to stimulate the economy, provide relief for automobile manufacturers and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In this research note, I present estimates of the implied cost of carbon dioxide reductions under the Cash [...]
Filed under: Energy and Climate, Transportation and Urban Land | Tagged: Government Policy, Autos, Fuel Economy, Cost Benefit Analysis | Leave a Comment »
Posted on August 4, 2009 by clotworthy
Belfer Center, Kennedy School, Harvard University / by Robert Stavins
http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/analysis/stavins/?p=219
Filed under: Regulating Risks | Tagged: Research, Cost Benefit Analysis | Leave a Comment »
Posted on August 4, 2009 by clotworthy
Munich Personal REPEC Archive (MPRA) / by D.N. Barton, G. Rusch, P. May, I. Ring, H. Unnerstall, R. Santos, P. Antunes, R. Brouwer, M. Grieg-Gran, J. Similä, E. Primmer, A. Romeiro, F. DeClerck and M. Ibrahim
http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15601/
[Abstract] In this paper we review a number of methodological challenges of evaluating and designing economic instruments aimed at biodiversity [...]
Filed under: The Natural World | Tagged: Government Policy, Research, Ecosystem Services, Cost Benefit Analysis, Conservation, Biodiversity | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 19, 2009 by clotworthy
ECONorthwest for The Program on Climate Economics, Climate Leadership Initiative, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon / by Ernie Niemi
http://climlead.uoregon.edu/pdfs/Inaction_NM_FnlRpt.pdf
If nothing is done to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, New Mexico could experience some $3.2 billion in associated costs — led primarily by wildfires and health-care. This could translate to an individual tab of [...]
Filed under: Energy and Climate | Tagged: Climate Change, Cost Benefit Analysis, Government Policy | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 19, 2009 by clotworthy
ECONorthwest for The Program on Climate Economics, Climate Leadership Initiative, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon / by Ernie Niemi
http://climlead.uoregon.edu/pdfs/Inaction_OR_FnlRpt.pdf
If nothing is done to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Oregon will face some $3.3 billion in annual costs, which could translate to an individual tab of about 4 percent of annual household income by [...]
Filed under: Energy and Climate | Tagged: Climate Change, Cost Benefit Analysis, Government Policy | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 19, 2009 by clotworthy
ECONorthwest for The Program on Climate Economics, Climate Leadership Initiative, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon / by Ernie Niemi
http://uonews.uoregon.edu/files/pmr/uploads/WA-Fnl_Rpt.pdf
If nothing is done to substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Washington is likely to experience some $3.8 billion in associated annual costs — including $1.3 billion in health related costs alone. That will translate [...]
Filed under: Energy and Climate | Tagged: Climate Change, Cost Benefit Analysis, Government Policy | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 6, 2009 by clotworthy
OECD / by European Conference of Ministers of Transport
http://www.sourceoecd.org/9789282102121
Subscription required. RFFers can access full-text on-site. If prompted for a username and password (and you likely will be) look on the library’s homepage upper left side.
[Abstract] Transport sector policies already contribute to moderating greenhouse gas emissions from road vehicles. They are increasingly designed to contribute to [...]
Filed under: Energy and Climate, Transportation and Urban Land | Tagged: Autos, Climate Change, Cost Benefit Analysis, Government Policy | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 6, 2009 by clotworthy
CRA International
http://www.api.org/Newsroom/upload/CRA_WPT_Study_1_30_2009.pdf
[From executive summary] IMPACTS ON ENERGY SECTOR
Specific impacts of the legislation on domestic energy markets include the following:
• A windfall profits tax on the oil and natural gas industry could result in an estimated average decline in domestic crude oil production of approximately 21-26% from baseline levels or between 1.5 to 1.9 million barrels [...]
Filed under: Energy and Climate | Tagged: Cost Benefit Analysis, Natural Gas, Oil, Taxes | Leave a Comment »